tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4146148016062694502.post6420899830558478852..comments2024-01-05T12:03:52.460-05:00Comments on No Lawyers - Only Guns and Money: California Attorney General's Statement Regarding Peruta AppealJohn Richardsonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03151468462458613615noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4146148016062694502.post-48267385966933523532014-03-31T03:30:18.769-04:002014-03-31T03:30:18.769-04:00I am agree with the information that you have shre...I am agree with the information that you have shred with us. Crime is increasing and every person wants his or her own safety. So,carrying a weapon for self defense is nice thing but should have concealed carry permit.MA Firearms Safety Coursehttp://www.massfirearmlicense.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4146148016062694502.post-25386653919756559532014-03-02T02:47:17.361-05:002014-03-02T02:47:17.361-05:00What part of "shall not infringe"does sh...What part of "shall not infringe"does she not understand?Roger V. Tranfaglianoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4146148016062694502.post-58614138925156610572014-03-01T23:40:17.074-05:002014-03-01T23:40:17.074-05:00Read her last paragraph carefully. She says that ...Read her last paragraph carefully. She says that applicants have to demonstrate “a set of circumstances that distinguish the applicant from the mainstream and causes him or her to be placed in harm’s way.” Note the word "mainstream". That should be the normal law-abiding citizen. She's saying that these citizen's, the "mainstream", don't have enough reason to enjoy their constitutional right to obtain a permit so they can "bear arms".<br /><br />anAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4146148016062694502.post-57589802161339675682014-03-01T14:43:34.733-05:002014-03-01T14:43:34.733-05:00Wait a minute. She said, “Local law enforcement m...Wait a minute. She said, <i><b>“Local law enforcement must be able to use their discretion to determine who can carry a concealed weapon," </b>Attorney General Harris said. </i><br /><br />IANAL (obviously), but didn't the 9th court specifically rule that No, local law enforcement may not "use their discretion"? IIRC, the ruling said they were obligated to either allow open or concealed carry unless the person applying didn't have their civil rights (i.e., convicted felons). Hard to imagine she's arguing they all be allowed open carry. <br />SiGraybeardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00280583031339062059noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4146148016062694502.post-23971940436955005832014-02-28T15:44:22.612-05:002014-02-28T15:44:22.612-05:00Oops, I missed the posting below this. Oops, I missed the posting below this. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4146148016062694502.post-51595928817888561332014-02-28T15:40:50.070-05:002014-02-28T15:40:50.070-05:00Question
Since the State Law was not struck down,...Question<br /><br />Since the State Law was not struck down, changed or revised, Does the CA AG have standing?<br /><br />The only thing that changed was the SD Sheriff's interpretation of the law was changed, and it now matches the interpretation of the majority of the CA counties (shall issue). How does the "prettiest AG in the nation" have standing? Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4146148016062694502.post-57847074532596757772014-02-28T14:06:32.604-05:002014-02-28T14:06:32.604-05:00One rule for Party members, one rule for everybody...One rule for Party members, one rule for everybody else.Bob Smithhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05893743800467576124noreply@blogger.com