The Illinois Observer and the Associated Press are both reporting that a compromise has been reached on a concealed carry bill in Illinois. That said, the Illinois Carry forum has generally been more accurate and more timely than the media. At this time (9 pm Eastern), they are saying they have nothing yet on a compromise.
From the Illinois Observer:
A top source tells The Illinois Observer that lawmakers have an agreement that will preempt home rule only on firearms transportation and existing conceal carry laws.The Associated Press is quoting Sen. Kwame Raoul (D-Chicago) as saying a compromise has been reached. The compromise legislation will be introduced on Friday by Sen. Gary Forby (D-Benton)
The legislators, State Senators Kwame Raoul (D-Chicago) and Tim Bivins (R-Dixon), State Reps. Mike Bost (R- Murphysboro), Ed Sullivan (R-Mundelein), Brandon Phelps (D-Harrisburg), Frank Mautino (D-Spring Valley) and Dennis Reboletti (R-Elmhurst) meeting House Speaker Michael Madigan’s conference room on Thursday afternoon, have also agreed that all existing assault weapons bans will remain in place.
However, the lawmakers, who excluded the governor’s Illinois State Police representatives from the negotiations, have agreed that any new assault weapon bans must be adopted by home rule communities within 10 days of the law taking effect. In reality, the new conceal carry law will ban any further assault weapons bans.
Additionally, the bill will abolish Chicago’s gun registry.
Raoul told The Associated Press that lawmakers are “still tightening up details” but the package has reached common ground on key issues. Those compromises include preserving local gun ordinances and prohibiting weapons from being carried in places including schools and public parks, and tightening penalties.Until we see the actual bill - if there is actually a bill - we won't know for sure what sort of compromise has been reached. The fact that it is Sen. Raoul being quoted as saying a compromise has been reached makes me just a bit suspicious. If it were Rep. Brandon Phelps (D-Harrisburg) who has been one of the leading pro-gun legislators in Illinois, I'd believe it.
Raoul says the bill will preserve elements from two pieces of legislation considered in a Senate committee earlier this week.
UPDATE: Todd Vandermyde, the NRA's lobbyist in Illinois and one of the most plugged-in guys I've ever met, had this to say on the IllinoisCarry.com forum about the compromise.
The senate has adjourned for the night.Frankly, if Todd hasn't seen the language on the compromise, then I can assure you that no one in the media has seen it either.
We are awaiting an amendment on a carry bill. Lots of rumors surrounding what is in and what is out.
Rumor is that the bill will go through the senate first.
With the senate adjourned, the mag ban SB1002 is impossible to pass into law as the bill requires three days in the house,there is only one left.
We may still see a lost or stolen type bill such as SB841 but again it needs 3 days to pass the house on all 3 readings. This assumes they don't tack it onto a houseboll and try to kick them, back on concurance.
I'd tell ya, but then I'd hafta kill ya...
ReplyDeleteSeriously though, I haven't seen the bill text yet either. However, what details I have heard sound promising.
ReplyDelete@David: That's good news then.
DeleteWhat are the reciprocity prospects?
ReplyDeleteDoubtful there will be any reciprocity. For some reason that is one thing both sides (House and Senate) have not been keen on.
ReplyDelete@David: It could be a money thing. Why let out-of-staters carry in Illinois for free when you can charge them $300 for the privilege.
DeleteI think we have a workable bill here: http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/98/HB/09800HB0183sam005.htm
ReplyDelete