Monday, December 23, 2013

90% Support Universal Background Checks?

You know how all we've heard for the past year is that 90% of Americans support universal background checks? Well, not so fast.

The National Shooting Sports Foundation has released a poll today that shows only 40% of Americans want universal background checks at gun shows. The difference in the poll results is because contextual detail was added to the question. Instead of asking do you want to close the "gun show loophole" or other such nonsense, the poll points out that most sales at gun shows are conducted with background checks and are by FFLs.

The poll goes further. Only 39% of respondents thought that requiring a background check for transferring a firearm between friends or family members would reduce violent crime. That's a long way from 90% in my calculations.

The poll was conducted in November for NSSF by McKeon and Associates. The poll sample included over 1,200 respondents and contained a margin of error of +/- 4.1%.

The release on the poll results with more details is below:

Americans Don't Think 'Universal Background Checks' Extension for Gun Shows Are Needed, National Poll Finds
NEWTOWN, Conn. -- Only four out of ten Americans support so-called "universal background checks" at gun shows after being informed that the vast majority of firearms sales at these shows are transacted by licensed retailers that already conduct such checks through the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) as required by federal law. The poll results stand in contrast to the vague claim often reported in the media and attributed to gun control proponents without important contextual detail that 90 percent of Americans surveyed support "universal background checks.
 "These findings were the among the results of a national scientific poll of more than 1,200 Americans conducted in November by McKeon & Associates and released today by the National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF), the trade association for the firearms and ammunition industry. The McKeon poll found that only 40 percent of respondents said that extension of "universal background checks" to private transactions at gun shows are necessary, while 53 percent said they are not necessary and 7% said they did not know.
The Americans polled also said by a combined 74 percent margin that conducting background checks against an incomplete database was not effective at all or not very effective while 54 percent said that requiring background checks for transferring guns between friends and family members was not at effective at all or not very effective in reducing violent crime.
links to hi-res JPG The poll also discovered that 92 percent of Americans agree that the states should submit all records of persons federally prohibited from owning a firearm to the FBI’s National Instant Criminal Background Check Systems (NICS), passing legislation if needed.
Some 70 percent of the survey sample also said that did not believe that government should mandate that all firearms produced incorporate “smart gun” technology should it become commercially available. Only 17 percent approved of a mandate, while 13 percent didn’t know.
links to hi-res JPG"We commissioned this poll to help determine where Americans stood on the various aspects of how the NICS system actually works today," said Larry G. Keane, NSSF senior vice president and general counsel. "When properly informed of relevant details, it turns out that only four out of ten, not nine out of ten Americans support so-called 'universal background checks' at gun shows or for firearms transfers. The poll also found that Americans want a National Instant Criminal Background Check System with a dependable and accurate database, which supports the goal of the FixNICS initiative we launched in 2013 and will continue in 2014."
links to hi-res JPGThe poll conducted Nov. 6-7 has a margin of error of +/- 4.1 percent. Respondents self-identified as 33 percent Democrat, 26 percent Republican and 41 percent independent. As to ethnicity, 62 percent of respondents said they were Caucasian, 18 percent African-American, 11 percent Hispanic; and 9 percent, other. As to age, 20 percent of respondents said they were 18-30; 36 percent, 31-45; 23 percent 46-60; and 21 percent, 60 or older.


  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

  2. For the record...
    1) Merry Christmas John!
    2) Not sure about you guys, but I don't support background checks at all. None. Zero. It's none of the gov's business. No more than you should have a registry of people who own bibles or a ten day waiting period before taking possession of one when you buy it.

  3. Much like statistical America, I don't think universal background checks are all that good of an idea, but I think a better prohibited person database would be a fine thing.

  4. If somebody wants expert take on the main topic of blogging next I advise him/her to go to this site, continue the fussy job. criminal background check

  5. What resumes and social media profiles won't tell you, though, is whether or not someone is truly a licensed professional or that he or she neglected to mention an alarming criminal record. To safeguard your business, a comprehensive background check is a must.
    employee background checks

  6. Good stuff, Today, it's rare to see a runner at the courthouse. Increasingly, background checks are entirely computer-generated, sometimes matching records with the wrong person. These include inconsistencies in ages, addresses and even names.
    employment background checks

  7. Very good and usable post. Thank's to share your experience with us. I will try to remember these tips in my blog commenting task.I also provide this service plz visit my site criminal background check for employment There are only so many providers of background screening technology just like there are only so many options for a business to remain solvent.