Friday, February 25, 2011

Microstamping Bill Introduced In Massachusetts

Rep. David Paul Linsky (D-Middlesex) has introduced House Bill 1561 in the Massachusetts State House. The bill would mandate all semi-automatic rifles, shotguns, and pistols sold or manufactured in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts be capable of imprinting a "microstamp" on the face of a cartridge effective January 1, 2012.

The text of the bill reads:
SECTION 1. Chapter 269 of the General Laws, as appearing in the 2004 Official Edition, is hereby amended by deleting Section 11E and inserting the following new section:-

Chapter 269: Section 11E. Serial identification numbers on firearms.

Section 11E.

(A) All firearms, rifles and shotguns of new manufacture, manufactured or delivered to any licensed dealer within the commonwealth shall bear serial numbers permanently inscribed on a visible metal area of said firearm, rifle or shotgun, and the manufacturer of said firearm, rifle or shotgun shall keep records of said serial numbers and the dealer, distributor or person to whom the firearm, rifle or shotgun was sold or delivered.

No licensed dealer shall order for delivery, cause to be delivered, offer for sale or sell within the commonwealth any newly manufactured firearm, rifle or shotgun received directly from a manufacturer, wholesaler or distributor not so inscribed with a serial number nor shall any licensed manufacturer or distributor of firearms, rifles or shotguns deliver or cause to be delivered within the commonwealth any firearm, rifle or shotgun not complying with this section.

No licensed manufacturer within the commonwealth shall produce for sale within the United States, its territories or possessions any firearm, rifle or shotgun not complying with paragraph one of this section. Whoever violates this section shall be punished by a fine of five hundred dollars. Each such violation shall constitute a separate offense.

(B) All semiautomatic firearms as defined in Chapter 140 Section 21 manufactured or delivered to any licensed dealer within the commonwealth shall be capable of microstamping ammunition.

(C) For purposes of subparagraph (B), a firearm is capable of microstamping ammunition if –
(i) a microscopic array of characters that identify the make, model, and serial number of the of the firearm is etched into the breech face and firing pin of the firearm; and
(ii) when ammunition is fired from the firearm, the characters are copied from the breech face and firing pin onto the cartridge case of the ammunition.

(D) Subparagraph (B) shall apply only to semiautomatic firearms which –
(i) are manufactured, or imported into the Commonwealth on or after the effective date of this subsection;
and
(ii) have not been transferred to a person not licensed under Chapter 140 of the general laws.

(D) Whoever violates paragraph (B) shall be fined an amount equal to –
(i) in the case of a first such violation by the violator, $1,000 multiplied by the number of firearms involved in the violation;
(ii) in the case of a second violation by the violator, $2,000 multiplied by the number of firearms involved in the violation;
(iii) in the case of a third such violation by the violator, $3,000 multiplied by the number of firearms involved in the violation.

(E) The effective date of this act shall be January 1, 2012.
The NRA-ILA had this to say, in part, about the bill:
If passed, the availability of semi-automatic rifles, shotguns and handguns in Massachusetts could be in jeopardy, as manufacturers simply may choose not to build or sell firearms for purchase in the state. In fact, this bill would likely create a de facto ban on new semi-automatic firearms.
Unless I am misunderstanding the language of this bill, both Smith & Wesson and Savage would be impacted by this bill as they both have manufacturing operations in the state and both make semi-automatic firearms.

Smith & Wesson would feel the heavier impact as they manufacture more semi-autos. Given that they were given a grant by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts to expand operations in Springfield while at the same time closing their Thompson-Center plant in New Hampshire just a couple of months ago, one must wonder if they are having second thoughts.

As it is, microstamping is an unproven, untested, and unreliable technology that can be defeated with a common nail file. If the true intent of Rep. Linsky and his fellow compatriots was to drive the gun makers out of the Commonwealth and kill job creation in Massachusetts, then they just might succeed if this bill passes.

8 comments:

  1. They know it doesn't work, it's just a way for them to ban more Victorian era based technology. As it is, you can't purchase any Colt SAA's in MA.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I hope Massachusetts likes losing all of those S&W jobs involved in semi-auto manufacturing. There are plenty of states that will be happy to host a new firearms factory. And, most of those states have lower taxes. I feel for the people who will lose jobs due to this legislation.

    ReplyDelete
  3. S&W is more than welcome to move its entire manufacturing plant to Spur, Texas. The privately operated jail that closed recently employed a considerable number of citizens here and could be converted to house a semi-auto firearms factory, and I'm sure the firm could work out at least temporary tax abatement measures with the municipality and county.

    [W3]

    ReplyDelete
  4. It seems this interferes with the ability of citizens to keep and bear arms... Does it run afoul of the second amendment?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Wisconsin Is Open for Business!!!

    ReplyDelete
  6. This is what the New York microstamping bill bill would do as well to Remington & Kimber. See the bill text here:

    http://www.assembly.state.ny.us/leg/?bn=a1157

    ReplyDelete
  7. Joke's on them. Smith and Wesson already learned what happens when they cooperate with the anti-civil rights crowd, so their options are:
    1)See that the bill doesn't pass, which is the easiest solution.
    2)Move semi-automatic production to a nearby state
    3)Move final assembly of semi-automatic firearms to a nearby state
    4)Move all manufacturing to a right to work state (The South, Y'all) which has lower taxes and a friendlier political atmosphere.

    What is the problem, exactly?

    Oh, and
    Dear, Kahr/Auto Ordinance,
    Thank you for choosing to set up shop in Florida, "the Gunshine State". We welcome you and hope you enjoy your new, property-tax free (for 25 years) facility here in Brevard County, former home of the Space Shuttle Program. We trust that you will find plenty of qualified workers with experience in Aerospace Manufacturing who will be more than happy to turn their design and machining skills towards production of your fine products.

    Sincerely,
    The People of FL

    ReplyDelete