Sunday, August 28, 2011

Boston Globe: Extreme Gun Control And Gun Manufacturing Can Co-Exist

The Boston Globe ran an editorial today discussing the potential for firearms manufacturers located in New England to leave for more gun friendly states if the Massachusetts, Connecticut, and Rhode Island legislatures adopt micro-stamping legislation.

Colt's management has already told Connecticut back in 2009 that they will be relocating if the state did adopt the requirement for micro-stamping.

After devoting a full paragraph to how easily micro-stamping can be defeated and that it has questionable utility in the first place, the Boston Globe editors essentially tell the gun manufacturers to sit down, shut up, and put up with this intrusion into their manufacturing practices.
While firearms manufacturers have a right to lobby against this legislation and explain their objections to it, it is inappropriate to wield the jobs of hundreds of workers as a weapon. Micro-stamping does not place any significant burden on the sale or manufacture of guns. It is not a ban or an arduous tax. It merely requires the engraving of a serial number in one more place on the weapon. If a state legislature decides micro-stamping is appropriate, it should not be forced to choose between citizens’ lives and citizens’ livelihood.
The Globe's editors don't get it. They want to eat their cake and have it, too. They want to have onerous gun control and they want the well-paying jobs provided by the gun industry. Sorry guys but it doesn't work that way.

There are many other states with good industrial locations, great industrial training programs, and which are gun friendly who would love to have the Colt's, the Smith and Wesson's, the Mossberg's, and Ruger's of the gun industry relocate to their state. Even the New York Times - the owner of the Boston Globe - recognizes this in a recent story.

The Globe concludes:
Massachusetts has had gun-control laws for almost three centuries, and the Connecticut River Valley has been a center of gun-making since George Washington established an armory in Springfield. There is no reason that both gun control and gun manufacturing cannot co-exist for the next few centuries as well.
Inertia and the existence of a well-trained force of machinists and gunsmiths is one reason that the gun industry has remained in the Northeast. However, if these states think inertia will keep the gun industry in a place that treats them like something the cat drug in, they are sadly mistaken.

UPDATE: For two other takes on the Boston Globe editorial, there are posts by Kurt Hofmann, the St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner, and by Sebastian at Snowflakes in Hell.

Kurt notes that:
Industries have no moral obligation to remain in states (or countries, for that matter) that actively work against them. They have every right to move their tax dollars and good jobs to states that won't use those resources to implement and enforce laws that work directly against the industries' interests.

Sebastian takes apart their claim that Massachusetts has had 300 years of gun control.
The Globe describes gun control in New England as a “centuries old tradition”. Reality is, it’s not even a century old tradition, at least not for the kind of gun laws that the Globe regularly speaks in favor of. Most of it, in fact, is less than a half-century old, and much less than 25. Centuries old Boston gun control was regulating where and how one could set up for target practice on Boston Commons, or the old Boston ordinance that said if you’re going to store your rifle, musket, pistol, bomb grenade or artillery piece, it would be nice if you stored it unloaded/deactivated so as not to cause fire hazards. It was still, until the 20th century, legal to carry a loaded pistol around Boston. Does the Globe favor returning to that gun control tradition?


  1. Let's flip that around. Why is it the gun manufacturers that are putting the jobs of hundreds of workers at risk? Why isn't it the politicians that went into this knowing what would happen, but did it anyway?

  2. It's just my opinion, but I believe that the northeastern manufacturers could find employees in the south that are every bit the equal of those where they are now.

    And probably cheaper, too.

  3. Exactly. 

    They know that they have a thriving industry that has been one of the few that has actually expanded during this recession. It provides tens of thousands of jobs and untold tax dollars. Yet at every turn, local politicians go out of their way to malign, demonize and berate "the industry" and their products. They spit in the faces of those who bring chests of gold. 

    Screw them. You reap what you sow. As an extra hit, the manufacturers should pull a Ronnie Barrett. Let the fascists enforce their edicts with batons instead of guns. It will show the world just how brutal they really are. 

  4. @45er: I agree it is the politicians who are putting the jobs at risk.

    @Packetman: I agree 100% with you. I know an unemployed old school tool and die maker who would jump at the chance to work for one of them. Plus our community colleges and tech schools are doing up-to-date training on CNC machining and programming.

    @jdberger: Can't you just see the Boston police trying to keep control using only a nightstick? LOL!

  5. Thanks for this blog. If anyone in Boston wants his own licensed gun then he may visit the Firearm Training Center Boston and join the Firearms safety training classes and get the gun. This training Institute is the best among all the training institutes and will provide the certification according to your capability and need.