Saturday, July 27, 2013

Times Editorial Is Laughably Inaccurate


The editorial board of the New York Times wouldn't know the difference between actual grass roots efforts and astroturfing if it bit them on their privileged asses. They show their ignorance in an unsigned editorial about the Colorado recall elections titled, "The Gun Lobby Takes Vengeful Aim."
The ink was barely dry, however, before the National Rifle Association was vindictively pressing for recall votes against two supporters of the stronger law, the State Senate president, John Morse, of Colorado Springs, and State Senator Angela Giron of Pueblo.

The recall vote, set for Sept. 10, could hardly be more important as a barometer of whether the public, which repeatedly registers support for tougher gun controls in surveys, will show up at the ballot to defend politicians who bucked the gun lobby.
If by gun lobby the New York Times means gun owning constituents, then they might be correct. However, this is not what they mean and we all know it. Unlike the gun controls measures which were written and lobbied for by Mayor Michael Bloomberg with the threat of money to primary opponents of any Democrat who didn't support them, the recall efforts have been actual grassroots efforts led by Coloradans.

The Basic Freedom Defense Fund was set up in February of this year to fight the gun control measures being financed by Bloomberg. After those measures were rammed through by Democrats, the Fund decided to start recall efforts against four Democrats. While the Times only mentions Morse and Giron, the recall effort also targeted State Sen. Mike McLachlan (D-Durango) and State Sen. Evie Hudak (D-Westminister). They were unsuccessful in getting enough signatures in the time allotted to force the recall of McLachlan and Hudak.

These politicians were targeted for two basic reasons. First, they were considered vulnerable due to close past elections. Second, they had ignored their constituents. Chris Wiggins of Shooter Ready Radio who lives in Pueblo told me over 1,000 constituents had turned up for a townhall meeting regarding gun control with State Sen. Angela Giron. Of these, less than two dozen spoke in support of gun control while the rest were adamantly opposed to the proposed measures which Giron ultimately supported.

Senate President John Morse (D-Colorado Springs) you may remember famously told his Democrat colleagues in the State Senate to ignore all the phone calls, emails, and letters from constituents and to vote for the gun control measures. This is the same Morse that the Times editorial calls "a respected Second Amendment proponent" and who states "Recalls are for unethical behavior, and not disagreements." I would agree with Morse but would go on to say that his behavior has been unethical and that a recall for him is right and proper.

The Times editorial concludes by saying this is an opportunity to rebuff the NRA and the gun industry.
For all the message of risk for politicians embodied in the vengeful recall attempt, there is a parallel opportunity for the public to rebuff the gun industry. But enough voters must show up in defense of two lawmakers who conscientiously stood for public safety.

The gun lobby’s defeat in Colorado would send a stirring message to statehouses across the nation that the public must not be denied in demanding better gun safety.
What they really mean is that the gun owning peons in Colorado should sit down, shut up, and kow-tow to their "betters" who know whats best for them. I hate to tell the Times editorial board this but we fought a revolution over 200 years ago over similar attitudes. The rabble won against the world's greatest army then and the rabble (aka the grassroots) will win again against Mayor Bloomberg and his bought and paid for minions in Colorado.

3 comments:

  1. Screwem... When they come start paying my bills, and paying for somebody to protect me, THEN I might listen to them...

    ReplyDelete
  2. It appears to me that "unethical" in the New York Times lexicon means "not supporting our agenda", while anything supporting their agenda is deemed to be ethical.

    ReplyDelete
  3. That editorial put the smile in my day.

    The great protector of all things progressive and liberal - the NY Times - is warning all Democrats everywhere what will happen when they cross gun owners. Doesn't matter that they ignore the locals. It's not like we don't know the score. Let everyone think the NRA is behind it. Heck, they can blame the boogie man. Don't care.

    What matters is the message: "Gun Control is not your friend."

    Bloomberg is running ads against Dems who didn't tow his line. The reason is not being correctly reported. The truth is he is warning possible defectors that they cross him at their peril. Their coalition is not comfortable with the gamble they took nationwide this year and he is trying to hold the line. Colorado is a key fight - if he loses that, he loses his major support.

    Still, he won this year in a lot of places. It's going to take time to undo the damage he created. While we work on that, we will continue to isolate and unelect the idiots who serve him.

    ReplyDelete