From the Denver Post:
The University of Colorado Boulder and University of Colorado Colorado Springs are amending their student housing contracts, segregating students who possess a valid concealed-carry permit.The new housing policy does two things. First, it seeks to use contract law to negate the ruling of the Colorado Supreme Court which stated that the University of Colorado did not have the power to ban concealed carry on campus. Second, and more insidiously, it points out to thugs, rapists, and other criminals areas on campus where they will be relatively safe. That is, by creating obvious gun-free zones, the University System has put a big red target on the back of all those students living in traditional undergraduate student housing.
The university said Thursday morning that both campuses will establish a residential area for residents over age 21 with a permit. In other residential areas, students will not be permitted to carry a concealed weapon, the new policy states.
The University of Colorado-Boulder is a bit more explicit about how they plan to segregate students.
The University of Colorado Boulder today announced it is amending housing contracts to ask students who live in undergraduate residence halls and hold a Colorado concealed carry permit, or CCP, to forgo bringing a handgun to campus. The campus also will accommodate those who hold a CCP in a graduate student housing complex off the main campus, provided the permit holders store their weapon in a safe within their dwelling when they are not carrying it.According to the University's "analysis", only 0.6% of faculty, staff, and students possess a Colorado Concealed Carry Permit as if this makes a difference. About the only reasonable thing the University does do is allow students who are in undergraduate student housing and who obtain a permit to be let out of their housing contract without a penalty.
The university also is asking residence advisers and faculty who live in university housing to sign the same housing agreement as a condition of their residence in these facilities.
Checking the housing contract, it doesn't seem to have been amended to reflect the new university policy. It refers on to the residence hall weapon policy and makes no mention of the above exception for getting out of the contract without a penalty. The residence hall weapon policy can be found here. It still states that "Firearms, explosives, ammunition, and dangerous weapons or materials are not permitted within or upon the grounds, buildings, residence halls, or any other facilities of the university." This would seem at odds with the Colorado Supreme Court ruling.
One last note on the Boulder campus' weapon policy, they ban squirt guns and Nerf guns as "dangerous weapons". I would wager that fewer people will be injured on the Boulder campus with either a squirt gun or a Nerf gun than will be hurt by their explicit demarcation of locations where one can and cannot live while possessing a concealed carry permit.
UPDATE: The student newspaper at the University of Colorado-Boulder, the Daily Camera, interviewed attorney Jim Manley of the Mountain States Legal Foundation about the new policy. Jim won the Colorado Supreme Court case which is forcing the university to allow concealed carry on campus. He is also a 2008 graduate of the University of Colorado Law School.
The new rules announced Thursday are troubling to James Manley, the attorney from the Mountain States Legal Foundation, who represented the student gun-rights group that brought the original lawsuit against CU's gun ban.
"We're going to take a hard look at the language, and if it conflicts with the concealed-carry act ruling of the Supreme Court, all options are open to us, including continuing the litigation that CU lost in March," Manley said.
I thought Brown V. Board of Education overturned "Separate but Equal"
ReplyDeleteJust sayin'
And those students with concealed carry licenses - they aren't allowed to visit their fellow students in the gun-free dorms?
ReplyDeleteThis will fall upon a request for summary judgement before the first judge who sees it.
Isn't it scary that these IDIOTS are educated our children. I am a firm believer that Forrest Gump was the only genius!
ReplyDeleteWasn't the "stored in a safe when not being carried" requirement one of the bright line unConstitutional elements of DC's handgun policy as decided by Heller and applied through McDonald? The need for immediate access being especially acute within the home and all.
ReplyDeleteNot sure that can be contracted away by a university housing contract any more than it can in public housing.
Makes for an interesting mini-scientific study if it is not nuked by a judge. The risk of theft, rape and murder would probably be lower in the designated CCP housing complex.
ReplyDeleteHeck, if I was there and to make a point, I'd put up special "anti-gun-free zone" signs that indicates that everyone is armed, so behave yourself!
So - beyond any other legal challenge (IANAL), would someone be able to successfully sue for housing discrimination?
ReplyDeleteI'm pretty sure you can't sign a contract to give up an unalienable right. Maybe to agree not to exercise one on private property. And since housing is still part of a government agency they can't fall back on the property right argument since the property belongs to the public, not a private person or entity.
ReplyDeletehi. its really a serious issue. students must be banned from carrying any sort of weapon either permitted or not. No one thinks without using a weapon even the permitted users when they are in the studying age group.
ReplyDeleteStudent Accommodation in US
Ok i need a all around reliable machine gun. I would like a gun because the world is going to shit and would like to feel a little bit more secure. I would like full auto, reliable, lightweight, well built gun. Money and getting the gun is not a problem for certain reasons. I was looking at a some but not knowing a whole lot about them which i need to know which is the best.
ReplyDeleteNow i'm convinced you cannot signal an agreement to quit a good inalienable correct. Perhaps to be able to concur never to workout 1 upon personal property. As well as because property remains a part of any agency they can not choose instead the home proper discussion considering that the home is among the community, not just a exclusive particular person or perhaps thing.
ReplyDeletephlebotomy training in CO
I think this site Mobile Homes Denver Sales Modu Homes Know as structural unit designed for occupancyManufactured Homesconstructed in a manufacturing facility and transported
ReplyDelete