Friday, March 1, 2013

Someone Needs To Do Some Explaining


Rep. Mitch Greenlick (D-Portland) is the primary sponsor of Oregon HB 3200. This bill, if passed, is a draconian gun control measure which would have drastic consequences.

From the Oregon Firearms Federation email alert:
HB 3200 not only bans most modern guns and magazines, it allows warrantless searches of your home, requires background checks and registration for a firearm you already own and as-of-yet undefined storage requirements. We say “a firearm” because even if you comply with the restrictions in this bill you may still only own one.
Section 4 of HB 3200 is the kicker. This section requires you to register your firearm and magazines owned before the bill's passage and to undergo a new background check. It then goes on to say:
(4) A person may not register more than one assault weapon and three large capacity magazines under this section. Additional assault weapons and large capacity magazines must be disposed of in the manner specified in section 3 of this 2013 Act.
(5) A registered owner of an assault weapon or large capacity magazine is required to:
(a) Securely store the assault weapon or large capacity magazine pursuant to rules and regulations adopted by the department;
(b) Allow an inspector from the department to inspect the storage of assault weapons and large capacity magazines to ensure compliance with this subsection;
Here is where it gets really curious. Rep. Greenlick who, mind you, is the primary sponsor and the one who introduced HB 3200, disagrees with parts of the bill he introduced.

From The Oregonian:
Even Rep. Mitch Greenlick, D-Portland, the chief sponsor of House Bill 3200, said the bill as introduced goes too far in not only banning the sale of these weapons but in limiting each gun owner to continue possessing just one of these firearms.

Greenlick said he also disagrees with a provision that would allow the state police to investigate gun owners who possess one of these weapons to make sure they are safely stored.

"In its current form, it's a pretty flawed bill," said Greenlick, adding that "I don't think [the bill] is in play."
As The Riddler of Batman fame would say, so riddle me this Rep. Greenlick, did you not know what was in the bill when you introduced it and, if not, why not?

Could this piece of legislation that has Oregon Ceasefire swooning be another piece of legislation written by Mayor Bloomberg and his Illegal Mayors and dropped by parachute into the hands of willing naifs in the Oregon Legislative Assembly?

Let's just say I wouldn't be surprised.

4 comments:

  1. Do they know what kind of lawsuits will be brought against them with that?? Sheesh!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Had the same happen at the Minnesota House hearings a few weeks back. Rep with her name on the bill claimed to not know what was in it. The shill from Protect Minnesota intoduced it and then attempted to "run" the hearing. She was smacked down hard. Rep originating the bill was absent (I believe) through most of the hearing.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Be a good thing to document. The progs are trying to get mileage from the "ALEC" and NRA are synonymous and are writing all the Stand Your Ground legislation, etc.

    Turn it around on Bloomy.

    ReplyDelete